Abstract Views :708 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Care Dental college, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, IN
2 Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Chennai, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 10, No 12 (2019), Pagination: 2416-2421
Abstract
With the increase in adult orthodontic treatment comes the need to find a reliable method for bonding orthodontic brackets onto metal or ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. In this study, shear bond strength and surface roughness tests by scanning electron microscope study were used to examine the effect of 5 different surface conditioning methods: 37% phosphoric acid gel, 9% Hydrofluoric acid, sandblasting + 9% Hydrofluoric acid, Sandblasting + Silane, Fine diamond bur roughening + silane for bonding metal brackets to ceramic surfaces of feldspathic porcelain. A total of 60 human maxillary premolar teeth extracted for therapeutic purposes from patients seeking orthodontic treatment were collected, and 50 ceramic crowns were fabricated onto the premolar teeth following crown preparation. 10 natural teeth were used as controls, they were acid etched in conventional manner using 37% phosphoric acid. Metal brackets were bonded using a light-curing composite. The samples were stored in distilled water at physiological temperature (37ºC) for 1 day, and thermocycled 500 times between 5°C and 55°C. Shear bond tests were performed with a universal testing device, and the results were statistically analysed. Ceramic surfaces conditioned with sand blasting followed by application of Silane produced maximum bond strength of 12.34 ± 0.95 MPa comparable or even better than the control group 11.03 ± 1.63 MPa followed by 9% Hydrofluoric acid 11.48 ± 0.98 MPa & Fine Diamond Bur roughening + Silane 9.28 ± 1.11 MPa. Ceramic surfaces conditioned with 37% Ortho Phosphoric acid produced least SBS of 5.51 ± 0.88 MPa and hence not suitable for bonding Orthodontic brackets in a clinical scenario. Statistical tests showed significant difference between and within the groups in shear bond strength and P value also was highly significant, i.e. ***p<0.001. The SEM photomicrographs of all the six different surface preparations revealed different surface morphologies & were corroborative of SBS values. Even though 9% Hydrofluoric acid and Fine diamond bur roughening produced clinically acceptable SBS values, because of their technique sensitivity and side effects, they have to be used with great care and caution. sand blasting followed by the application of Silane coupling agent was found to be the best porcelain surface conditioning method.
Keywords
Bond Strength, Metal Brackets, Ceramic Surfaces, PFM’s: Surface-conditioning, Sand Blasting.
